Kinerja Gateway Berbasis XMPP untuk Layanan Komunikasi pada Perangkat IoT

Performance of XMPP-Based Gateway for IoT Device Communication Services

*Mahar Faiqurahman orcid scopus  -  Department of Informatics, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Muhammad Malik Madani  -  Department of Informatics, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Denar Regata Akbi  -  Department of Informatics, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Received: 11 Feb 2019; Revised: 13 Sep 2019; Accepted: 18 Sep 2019; Published: 31 Oct 2019; Available online: 3 Oct 2019.
DOI: Download

Type Research Instrument
  Download (597KB)    Indexing metadata
Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: ID
Statistics: 186
In this study, we build a communication Gateway to support inter-device connection and communication which is needed by the IoT system. The purpose of this system is to make the IoT device can connect with each other using internet connection. From the experiment result, we can see that the connecting IoT devices can communicate by sending request-response messages. The experiment result also shows that during the data transmission process, the CPU usage has increased for at least 12%, and memory usage has inclined stably.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

IoT; XMPP Protocol; Communication Gateway

Article Metrics:

  1. M. U. Farooq, M. Waseem, S. Mazhar, A. Khairi, and T. Kamal, “A review on Internet of Things (IoT),” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2015.
  2. R. Klauck and M. Kirsche, “Chatty things-Making the Internet of Things readily usable for the masses with XMPP,” in Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom), 2012 8th International Conference On, 2012, pp. 60–69.
  3. Y. Wenbo, W. Quanyu, and G. Zhenwei, “Smart home implementation based on Internet and WiFi technology,” in Control Conference (CCC), 2015 34th Chinese, 2015, pp. 9072–9077.
  4. A. Junaidi, “Internet of Things, Sejarah, Teknologi dan Penerapannya,” J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf. Terap., vol. 1, no. 3, 2015.
  5. A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, 2015.
  6. P. Masek et al., “Implementation of true IoT vision: survey on enabling protocols and hands-on experience,” Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Networks, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 8160282, 2016.
  7. S. Bendel, T. Springer, D. Schuster, A. Schill, R. Ackermann, and M. Ameling, “A service infrastructure for the Internet of Things based on XMPP,” in Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, 2013, pp. 385–388.
  8. M. B. Yassein and M. Q. Shatnawi, “Application layer protocols for the Internet of Things: A survey,” in Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS), International Conference on, 2016, pp. 1–4.
  9. E. Zuliarso and H. Februariyanti, “Pemanfaatan instant messaging untuk aplikasi layanan akademik,” Din. Teknol. Inf., vol. 18, no. 2, 2013.
  10. D. J. Cook, A. S. Crandall, B. L. Thomas, and N. C. Krishnan, “CASAS: A smart home in a box,” Computer (Long. Beach. Calif)., vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 62–69, 2013.