skip to main content

Klasifikasi pendonor darah potensial menggunakan pendekatan algoritme pembelajaran mesin

Classification of potential blood donors using machine learning algorithms approach

1Department of Electronics, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

2Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

Received: 7 Jan 2020; Revised: 21 Apr 2020; Accepted: 24 Apr 2020; Available online: 25 Apr 2020; Published: 31 Jul 2020.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Blood donation is the process of taking blood from someone used for blood transfusions. Blood type, sex, age, blood pressure, and hemoglobin are blood donor criteria that must be met and processed manually to classify blood donor eligibility. The manual process resulted in an irregular blood supply because blood donor candidates did not meet the criteria. This study implements machine learning algorithms includes kNN, naïve Bayes, and neural network methods to determine the eligibility of blood donors. This study used 600 training data divided into two classes, namely potential and non-potential donors. The test results show that the accuracy of the neural network is 84.3 %, higher than kNN and naïve Bayes, respectively of 75 % and 84.17 %. It indicates that the neural network method outperforms comparing with kNN and naïve Bayes.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Set Data
Blood Transfusion Service Center Data Set
Subject
Type Set Data
  View (10KB)    Indexing metadata
Email colleagues
Keywords: potential blood donor; KNN; Naïve Bayes; donors classification
Funding: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang melalui Skema Pusat Kajian dan Rekayasa Teknik PUSKAREKA 2019

Article Metrics:

  1. F. Boulton, "Evidence-based criteria for the care and selection of blood donors, with some comments on the relationship to blood supply, and emphasis on the management of donation-induced iron depletion," Transfusion Medicine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 13-27, 2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00818.x
  2. A. Eder, M. Goldman, S. Rossmann, D. Waxman, and C. Bianco, "Selection criteria to protect the blood donor in North America and Europe: past (dogma), present (evidence), and future (hemovigilance)," Transfusion Medicine Reviews, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 205-220, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2009.03.003
  3. W. B. Zulfikar, Y. A. Gerhana, and A. F. Rahmania, "An approach to classify eligibility blood donors using decision tree and naive bayes classifier," in 6th International Conference Cyber IT Service Management (CITSM), Parapat, Indonesia, Aug. 2018, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/CITSM.2018.8674353
  4. Blood donor selection: guidelines on assessing donor suitability for blood donor donation. World Healt Organization, 2012
  5. I.-C. Yeh, K.-J. Yang, and T.-M. Ting, "Knowledge discovery on RFM model using Bernoulli sequence," Expert System with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, part 2, pp. 5866-5871, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.018
  6. W. E. Susanto and D. Riana, "Komparasi algoritma neural network, k-nearest network dan naive bayes untuk memprediksi pendonor darah potensial," Jurnal Speed, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 18-27, 2016
  7. B. M. Shashikala, M. P. Pushpalatha, and B. Vijaya, "Machine learning approaches for potential blood donors prediction," in Emerging Research in Electronics, Computer Science and Technology, vol. 545, 2019, pp. 483-491. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-5802-9_44
  8. M. A. jabbar, B. L. Deekshatulu, and P. Chandra, “Classification of heart disease using k-nearest neighbor and genetic algorithm,” Procedia Technology, vol. 10, pp. 85–94, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.340
  9. H. Yigit, “A weighting approach for KNN classifier,” in International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation, Ankara, Turkey, Nov. 2013, pp. 228–231. doi: 10.1109/ICECCO.2013.6718270
  10. X. Wu et al., “Top 10 algorithms in data mining,” Knowledge and Information System, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-37, 2008. doi: 10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2
  11. Y. Kumar and G. Sahoo, “Prediction of different types of liver diseases using rule based classification model,” Technology and Health Care, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 417–432, 2013. doi: 10.3233/THC-130742
  12. M. Mishra and M. Srivastava, “A view of artificial neural network,” in International Conference on Advances in Engineering & Technology Research, Unnao, India, Aug. 2014, pp. 1-3. doi: 10.1109/ICAETR.2014.7012785
  13. W. B. Zulfikar, M. Irfan, C. N. Alam, and M. Indra, "The comparation of text mining with Naive Bayes classifier, nearest neighbor, and decision tree to detect Indonesian swear words on Twitter," in 5th International Conference Cyber IT Service Management (CITSM), Denpasar, Indonesia, Aug. 2017, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/CITSM.2017.8089231
  14. W. B. Zulfikar and N. Lukman, "Perbandingan Naive Bayes classifier dengan Nearest Neighbor untuk identifikasi penyakit mata," Journal Online Informatika, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 82-86, 2016, doi: 10.15575/join.v1i2.33
  15. J. Yang, Z. Ye, X. Zhang, W. Liu, and H. Jin, "Attribute weighted Naive Bayes for remote sensing image classification based on cuckoo search algorithm," in 2017 International Conference Security Pattern Analylis, and Cybernetics (SPAC), Shenzen, China, Dec. 2017, pp. 169-174. doi: 10.1109/SPAC.2017.8304270
  16. M. Darwiche, M. Feuilloy, G. Bousaleh, and D. Schang, "Prediction of blood transfusion donation," in 4th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), Nice, France, May 2010, pp. 51-56. doi: 10.1109/RCIS.2010.5507363
  17. B. Gabrys and L. Petrakieva, “Combining labelled and unlabelled data in the design of pattern classification systems,” Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 251–273, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2003.08.005
  18. S. Agarwal, “Data mining: Data mining concepts and techniques,” in International Conference on Machine Intelligence and Research Advancement, Katra, India, Dec. 2013, pp. 203-207. doi: 10.1109/ICMIRA.2013.45

Last update:

  1. Prediksi Siswa Putus Sekolah Swasta Menggunakan Algoritma Bayesian Network (Studi Pada : SMA Islam Al Wahid Kepung)

    Rifky Yunus Krisnabayu, Ahmad Afif Supianto, Satrio Agung Wicaksono. Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer, 10 (2), 2022. doi: 10.14710/jtsiskom.2022.14121
  2. Classification of beneficiaries for the rehabilitation of uninhabitable houses using the K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm

    An-Naas Shahifatun Na’iema, Harminto Mulyo, Nur Aeni Widiastuti. Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer, 10 (1), 2022. doi: 10.14710/jtsiskom.2021.14110

Last update: 2024-11-04 15:43:33

No citation recorded.