DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jtsiskom.7.4.2019.127-133

Kinerja gateway berbasis XMPP untuk komunikasi perangkat IoT

Performance of XMPP-Based Gateway for IoT Device Communication Services

Department of Informatics, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

Received: 11 Feb 2019; Revised: 13 Sep 2019; Accepted: 18 Sep 2019; Available online: 3 Oct 2019; Published: 31 Oct 2019.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
This study examines the performance of a communication gateway for IoT devices by utilizing the XMPP protocol so that these devices can be connected and communicate using the Internet. The sensor nodes, which are IoT devices, were implemented using NodeMCU connected to the DHT11 sensor module and LED lights to simulate the incoming data. Sensor nodes can communicate using the XMPP protocol gateway and process the request-response data. Gateway data transmission performance with size variations from 10-100 MB gets an average delay time of 9.3 ms, an average jitter of 0.00178 ms, and an average throughput of 161.4 kbps. The CPU usage parameter has an average increase of 12%, and memory usage tends to be constant when data transmission occurs.
Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: IoT; XMPP protocol; communication gateway
Funding: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Articles
Language : ID
Related articles
Pengembangan Aplikasi Android Pada UKM Basket Universitas Diponegoro Speech Recognition and Analysis of Electrical Device Control Systems Using Arduino Uno Sistem Informasi Penjualan dan Pemesanan Layanan Berbasis Web dan SMS Gateway di Petshop "PetZone" A galvanic-based dissolved oxygen level monitoring sensor system in freshwater ponds Enhanced image security using residue number system and new Arnold transform More related articles
Most cited articles
Perancangan Jaringan Sensor Terdistribusi untuk Pengaturan Suhu, Kelembaban dan Intensitas Cahaya Flood Prediction with Ensemble Machine Learning using BP-NN and SVM Optimization for prediction model of palm oil land suitability using spatial decision tree algorithm Aplikasi Pendeteksi Kualitas Daging Menggunakan Segmentasi Region of Interest Berbasis Mobile Pengembangan Aplikasi Multimedia untuk Pembelajaran Satelit Astronomi NASA dengan Teknologi Augmented Reality Berbasis Android More cited articles
  1. M. U. Farooq, M. Waseem, S. Mazhar, A. Khairi, and T. Kamal, “A review on internet of things (IoT),” International Journal of Computing Applications, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2015. doi: 10.5120/19787-1571
  2. R. Klauck and M. Kirsche, “hatty things-making the internet of things readily usable for the masses with XMPP,” in 8th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom), Pittsburgh, USA, Oct. 2012, pp. 60-69. doi: 10.4108/icst.collaboratecom.2012.250464
  3. Y. Wenbo, W. Quanyu, and G. Zhenwei, “Smart home implementation based on Internet and wifi technology,” in 2015 34th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Hangzhou, China, Jul. 2015, pp. 9072–9077. doi: 10.1109/ChiCC.2015.7261075
  4. A. Junaidi, “Internet of things, sejarah, teknologi dan penerapannya: review,” Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Terapan, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 62-66, 2015
  5. A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of things: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Communication Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, 2015. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095
  6. P. Masek et al., “Implementation of true IoT vision: survey on enabling protocols and hands-on experience,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 12, no. 4, 2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/8160282
  7. S. Bendel, T. Springer, D. Schuster, A. Schill, R. Ackermann, and M. Ameling, “A service infrastructure for the internet of things based on XMPP,” in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), San Diego, USA, Mar. 2013, pp. 385–388. doi: 10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529522
  8. P. Kayal and H. Perros, “A comparison of iot application layer protocols through a smart parking implementation,” in 2017 20th Conference on Innovations in Clouds, Internet and Networks (ICIN), Paris, France, Mar. 2017, pp. 331–336. doi: 10.1109/ICIN.2017.7899436
  9. M. B. Yassein, M. Q. Shatnawai, and D. Al-zoubi, “Application layer protocols for the internet of things: a survey,” in 2016 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS), Agadir, Marocco, Sep. 2016, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.1109/ICEMIS.2016.7745303
  10. E. Zuliarso and H. Februariyanti, “Pemanfaatan instant messaging untuk aplikasi layanan akademik,” Jurnal Dinamik, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 112-121, 2013
  11. D. J. Cook, A. S. Crandall, B. L. Thomas, and N. C. Krishnan, “CASAS: a smart home in a box,” Computer (Long Beach Calif), vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 62–69, 2013. doi: 10.1109/MC.2012.328
  12. Y. Chen and T. Kunz, “Performance evaluation of IoT protocols under a constrained wireless access network,” in 2016 International Conference on Selected Topics in Mobile & Wireless Networking (MoWNeT), Cairo, Egypt, Apr. 2016, pp. 1-7. doi: 10.1109/MoWNet.2016.7496622
  13. M. Pohl, J. Kubela, S. Bosse, and K. Turowski, “Performance evaluation of application layer protocols for the internet-of-things,” in 2018 Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Systems (ES), Limassol, Cyprus, Oct. 2018, pp. 180-187. doi: 10.1109/ES.2018.00035
  14. H. Wang, D. Xiong, P. Wang, and Y. Liu, “A lightweight XMPP publish/subscribe scheme for resource-constrained IoT devices,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 16393–16405, 2017. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2742020

Last update:

  1. Internet of Things: Device Capabilities, Architectures, Protocols, and Smart Applications in Healthcare Domain

    Md. Milon Islam, Sheikh Nooruddin, Fakhri Karray, Ghulam Muhammad. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10 (4), 2023. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3228795

Last update: 2024-12-21 20:08:17

No citation recorded.