skip to main content

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Merekomendasikan Unit Terbaik di PDAM Tirta Lihou Menggunakan Metode Promethee

Decision Support System in Recommending Best Unit in PDAM Tirta Lihou Using Promethee Method

Department of Information System, STIKOM Tunas Bangsa Pematangsiantar, Indonesia

Received: 3 Aug 2017; Published: 31 Oct 2017.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This research aims to develop decision support system in determining the best production unit in PDAM Tirta Lihou, Simalungun District. The research data were sourced from the institution in 2014. The alternatives used were 34 units of production and 6 criteria as the ranking of the best production unit such as the criteria for selling of water supply (C1), evaluation of arrears achieved (C2), evaluation of leakage rate (C3), running bill evaluation (C4), number of new customers (C5) and sales / use of water per customer (C6). The method used in this research was Promethee. The research showed that the best unit in PDAM Tirta Lihou was the Tanah Jawa unit with Net Flow 0.16274. With this system, agency leaders can produce a better decision to select the best unit in a more objective way.

(The data set and data results in this study are available in the supplementary section available online and downloadable)

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Data Set
Dataset Penelitian SPK Unit PDAM Tirta Lihou Terbaik
Subject Dataset penelitian (penjualan rekening, tunggakan air, tingkat kebocoran, tagihan berjalan, jumlah sambungan baru, dan penjualan air) dan hasil olah data
Type Data Set
  Download (491KB)    Indexing metadata
Email colleagues
Keywords: decision support system; best unit recommendation; Promethee method; PDAM performance assessment
Funding: AMIK Tunas Bangsa Pematangsiantar

Article Metrics:

  1. I. H. Firdaus, G. Abdillah, F. Renaldi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Ahp Dan Topsis,” in Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi 2016 (SENTIKA 2016) , 18-19 Maret 2016
  2. J. Lemantara, N. A. Setiawan, and M. N. Aji, "Rancang Bangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode AHP dan Promethee," Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi (JNTETI), vol. 2, no. 1, 2013
  3. F. S. Priyanto, B. Harijanto, and Y. Watequlis, ”Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Promethee,” Jurnal Informatika Polinema, vol. 3, no.4, pp. 23-28, 2017
  4. O. A. Asmara, and A. Susanto, ”Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Karyawan Pada Saudara Group Semarang Menggunakan Metode Promethee,” Skripsi, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Juli 2013
  5. R. Hidayat, ”Menentukan Promosi Jabatan Karyawan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching Dan Metode Promethee,” Indonesian Journal on Software Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016
  6. C. W. Andi, ”Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Promethee Di Museum Ranggawarsita Semarang,” Skripsi, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, 2015
  7. S. Abadi, and F. Latifah, "Decision Support System Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan pada Perusahaan dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting," Jurnal TAM (Technology Acceptance Model), vol. 6, pp. 37-43, 2017
  8. A. G. Anto, H. Mustafidah, and A. Suyudi, "Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Metode SAW," Jurnal Informatik (JUITA), vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 193-200, 2015
  9. A. Suryana, E. Yulianto, and K. D. Pratama, "Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Prestasi Pegawai Menggunakan Metode SAW, AHP, dan TOPSIS," Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Terapan, vol. 3, no. 2, 2017
  10. R. Irawan, and S. Winiarti, "Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Lokasi dan Evaluasi Lokasi Pemasaran Produk (Gula) Menggunakan Metode AHP (Studi Kasus: PT. Madubaru)," Jurnal Informatika, vol. 9, no. 2, Juli 2015
  11. G. Gunawan, and S. Astuti, ”Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Gadget Android Menggunakan Metode PROMETHEE,” Techno. Com., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 104-116, Mei 2013
  12. R. Hanifah, “Implementasi Metode PROMETHEE Dalam Menentukan Penerimaan Kredit Usaha Rakyat(KUR),” Jurnal Teknologi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 169-177, Desember 2015
  13. M. Muhardiansyah, Z. Arifin, and S. Maharani, “Perangkat Lunak Bantu Pemilihan Komputer Menggunakan Metode PROMETHEE,” in Prosiding Seminar Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi (SAKTI), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 71-76, September 2016
  14. A. Nurzahputra, A. R. Pranata, A. Puwinarko, ”Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Line-up Pemain Sepak Bola Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making dan K-Means Clustering,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 106-109, 2017
  15. E. Puspitarini, K. Kusrini, and E. T. Lutfi, "Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Menggunakan Logika Fuzzy," in Proc. Konferensi Nasional Sistem dan Informatik (KNS&I), 2015, pp. 927-932
  16. P. Mursanto, and W. Sari, "Defining Relative Qualities of Object Oriented Design Implementations using AHP and Promethee," in Proc. International Symposium on The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2011
  17. J. P. Brans, and Ph. Vincke, "A preference ranking organization method: The PROMETHEE methods," Management Science, vol. 31, pp. 647-656, 1984

Last update:

  1. Decision support system using PROMETHEE Algorithm

    Benget Simamora, A Amril, Indah Wahyu Utami, Komang Shanty Muni Parwati, Wisnu Rayhan Adhitya, Joli Afriany, Saipul Al Sukri, Desi Asima Silitonga, Siti Aisyah. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1088 (1), 2021. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1088/1/012003
  2. Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process Method for SQM on Customer Satisfaction

    Ramayani Yusuf, Fenny Damayanti, P Purnomo, Aep Tata Suryana, Dewi Kartikaningsih, Agus Perdana Windarto, Ari Waluyo. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1783 (1), 2021. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1783/1/012019
  3. Analysis of Multi-attribute Utility Theory for College Ranking Decision Making

    Adidtya Perdana, Arief Budiman. SinkrOn, 4 (2), 2020. doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v4i2.10232

Last update: 2024-12-21 01:07:20

  1. Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process Method for SQM on Customer Satisfaction

    Ramayani Yusuf, Fenny Damayanti, P Purnomo, Aep Tata Suryana, Dewi Kartikaningsih, Agus Perdana Windarto, Ari Waluyo. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1783 (1), 2021. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1783/1/012019