Perbandingan Kinerja Perangkat Lunak Forensik untuk File Carving dengan Metode NIST

Performance Comparison of Forensic Software for Carving Files using NIST Method

Doddy Teguh Yuwono  -  Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
*Abdul Fadlil scopus  -  Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
Sunardi Sunardi scopus  -  Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
Received: 28 Nov 2018; Revised: 19 Apr 2019; Accepted: 22 Jul 2019; Published: 31 Jul 2019; Available online: 4 Aug 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jtsiskom.7.3.2019.89-92 View
Analisis File Carving Dengan Metode National Institute Of Standards And Technology (NIST)
Subject Digital Forensic, Flash Memory, Hard Drive, NIST, Scalpel
Type Research Instrument
  View (55KB)    Indexing metadata
Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Original Research Articles
Language: ID
Statistics: 750 311
Abstract
Data lost due to the fast format or system crash will remain in the media sector of storage. Digital forensics needs proof and techniques for retrieving data lost in storage. This research studied the performance comparison of open-source forensic software for data retrieval, namely Scalpel, Foremost, and Autopsy, using the National Institute of Standards Technology (NIST) forensic method. The testing process was carried out using the file carving technique. The carving file results are analyzed based on the success rate (accuracy) of the forensic tools used in returning the data. Scalpel performed the highest accuracy for file carving of 100% success rate for 20 document files in pdf and Docx format, and 90% for 10 image files in png and jpeg format.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Keywords: digital forensics; data retrieval tools; file carving; accuracy of forensic tools

Article Metrics:

  1. V. Rosalina, A. Suhendarsah, and M. Natsir, “Analisis Data Recovery Menggunakan Software Forensic : Winhex and X-Ways Forensic,” PROSISKO: Jurnal Pengembangan Riset dan Observasi Sistem Komputer, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 51-55, 2016.
  2. I. Riadi, R. Umar, and I. M. Nasrulloh, “Analisis Forensik Digital Pada Frozen Slod State Drive Dengan Metode National Institute of Justice (NIJ),” ELINVO (Electronics, Informatics and Vocational Education), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 70–82, 2018.
  3. R. R. Oommen and P. Sugathan, “Recovering Deleted Files from NTFS,” International Journal of Science and Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 205-208, 2016.
  4. A. Chandsarkar and S. Patil, “Simplifying Data Recovery with Advance Techniques and Operations,” International Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 217-221, 2016.
  5. F. Albanna and I. Riadi, “Forensic Analysis of Frozen Hard Drive using Static Forensics Method,” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 173-178, 2017.
  6. I. Riadi and E. Rauli, “Identifikasi Bukti Digital WhatsApp pada Sistem Operasi Proprietary Menggunakan Live Forensics,” Jurnal Teknik Elektro, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 18-22, 2018.
  7. M. N. Faiz, R. Umar, and A. Yudhana, “Analisis Live Forensics Untuk Perbandingan Kemananan Email Pada Sistem Operasi Proprietary,” ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 242-247, 2016.
  8. S. Soni, Y. Prayudi, and B. Sugiantoro, “Teknik Akuisisi Virtualisasi Server Menggunakan Metode Live Forensic,” Teknomatika, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1-13, 2017.
  9. A. Yudhana, I. Riadi, and I. Anshori, “Analisis Bukti Digital Facebook Messenger Menggunakan Metode Nist,” Information Technology Journal Research and Development, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13-21, 2018.
  10. I. Riadi et al., “Analisis Recovery Bukti Digital Instagram Messangers Menggunakan Metode National Institute Of Standards And Technology (NIST),” Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 161-166, 2017.
  11. I. Riadi, Sunardi, and A. Firdonsyah, “Forensic Investigation Technique on Android’s Blackberry Messenger using NIST Framework,” International Journal of Cyber-Security and Digital Forensic, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 198-205, 2017.
  12. I. Riadi, A. Yudhana, M. Caesar, and F. Putra, “Akuisisi Bukti Digital Pada Instagram Messenger Berbasis Android Menggunakan Metode National Institute Of Justice (NIJ),” Jurnal Teknologi Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 219-227, 2018.
  13. R. Muttaqin, A. Arini, and F. Mintarsih, “Perbandingan Carving Tools Foremost dan Scalpel,” Jurnal Teknik Informatika, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 63-72, 2015.
  14. G. G. Richard and V. Roussev, “Scalpel: A Frugal, High Performance File Carver,” in 2005 Digital Forensic Research Workshop (DFRWS), USA, New Orleans, 2005, pp. 1-10.

No citation recorded.